Can someone give me a solid argument
why Democrats have found it necessary to "tone down" the rhetoric against the policies of the Bush administration and Republican Party at the Convention?
So far, every cable and network media whore show I've seen has drawn on top-level Democrats "censoring" the speeches and asking speakers to drop lines that were overly critical.
Personally, I think this is retarded. Yes, concentrate on the positive- when you're up against these Republicans it's not that hard but at the same time, we need to hit them.
So, why the hell go in this direction? It took a maverick like Howard Dean to give the Democrats balls in the prmaries, do we need another Dean (or even Dean again) to give the Party a pulse now in the next couple of crucial months?
I'm finding it sad and it worries me because the opposition will slit your fucking throat. After seeing this happen to them for years, why do Democrats continually act so passive?